Michigan Trust Disputes and Trust Contests Attorneys
Maybe distributions that should have happened months ago still haven’t arrived. Maybe your sibling, who is also the trustee, stopped returning calls after your parent died. Maybe a stepparent rewrote a trust in the final weeks of a parent’s illness, and the new version looks nothing like what your family understood the plan to be. Maybe you have administered the trust correctly, but someone in the family says otherwise.
The attorneys at Head Murphy Law understand both sides of trust disputes in Michigan. We work with trustees who are trying to administer a trust correctly and need legal guidance to protect themselves. We also work with beneficiaries who suspect they are being cheated, stonewalled, or cut out of something they were promised. Whether you are sitting in the trustee’s chair or watching from the outside, we can help you understand your position and what options may be available.
Trust disputes fall under Michigan’s probate law framework, and they are handled through the probate court system. If you believe there is foul play by a trustee, misuse of assets, or any other legal issue involved with a trust, it is important to contact an attorney experienced with both probate and Michigan trusts. The rules are specific. The deadlines are real. And waiting rarely helps anyone except the person who is already in control of the money.
Beneficiaries are not passive bystanders. Michigan law gives them real, enforceable rights, and those rights do not disappear just because a trustee is slow to communicate or reluctant to share documents.
Under the Michigan Trust Code, a trustee must, upon the reasonable request of a trust beneficiary, promptly furnish a copy of the terms of the trust that describe or affect the beneficiary’s interest. The trustee must also notify qualified trust beneficiaries within 63 days after accepting the trusteeship of the acceptance, of the court in which the trust is registered if it is registered, and of the trustee’s name, address, and telephone number. That same 63-day window applies after the trustee learns that a formerly revocable trust has become irrevocable, such as upon the death of the person who created it.
At least annually, and at the termination of the trust, the trustee must send a report of the trust property, liabilities, receipts, and disbursements, including the source and amount of the trustee’s compensation, a listing of the trust property, and their respective market values where feasible.
The Michigan Trust Code also imposes a duty to keep qualified trust beneficiaries reasonably informed about the administration of the trust and the material facts necessary for them to protect their interests.
This obligation to inform beneficiaries cannot be eliminated by the terms of the trust. A trustee cannot simply point to language buried in the trust document and claim they had no duty to communicate. If your trustee is refusing to share information, that refusal may itself be a violation of Michigan law.
To challenge a trust, meaning to argue that the trust itself is invalid or should not be enforced as written, you generally need to have a legal stake in the outcome. Under Michigan law, a trust can only be contested by a party with a vested interest in the trust.
Beyond standing, you need legal grounds. Feeling that a result is unfair is not, by itself, enough. Michigan law stipulates that anyone claiming a trust is invalid must have legal grounds to do so, and accepted grounds include situations where the trust was not correctly executed or the person creating the trust lacked mental capacity, was under duress or undue influence, or was a victim of a scam or fraud.
Many trust contests are resolved before trial through negotiation, and Michigan law establishes mediation procedures that apply to trust disputes. Many probate courts require attempted mediation before proceeding to trial.
Trust disputes in the Detroit area are typically filed in the probate court for the county where the trustee lives or maintains their principal place of trust administration. Where a corporate trustee is involved, the principal trust office is likely to be in Detroit or Oakland County, and you will likely file your action in Wayne or Oakland County. For individuals serving as trustees, the filing county often depends on where they reside or conduct trust business.
When someone decides to challenge a trust in Michigan, the challenge usually centers on one of a handful of recognized legal theories. Each one requires evidence, not just suspicion.
The person who created the trust, called the grantor or settlor, must have had the mental ability to understand what they were doing at the time they signed it. Lack of capacity means the grantor did not have the capability to understand the consequences of their decisions. Medical records, physician notes, and testimony from people who observed the grantor around the time of signing can all become relevant. A diagnosis of dementia or a serious illness does not automatically prove incapacity, but it can be significant evidence.
This is the ground most commonly raised in Detroit-area trust disputes involving elderly parents and blended families. Undue influence occurs when someone in a position of trust or authority pressures the grantor into making estate planning decisions that do not reflect their actual wishes. Courts examine the influencer’s opportunity and disposition to exert control, the principal’s susceptibility, and whether the transaction appears unnatural given family circumstances.
A stepparent who isolated a dying spouse from adult children, or a sibling who moved into a parent’s home and suddenly appeared as the sole beneficiary of a revised trust, may present the kind of circumstances courts find worth examining.
Disputes may also arise if a trust was created or amended when the grantor was incapacitated or under undue influence, essentially a trust contest analogous to a will contest. Fraud in this context often means the grantor was misled about what they were signing or what the document contained. Duress means they were coerced, threatened, or pressured into signing something against their will.
With trust contests, the burden of proof is on the challenger to prove the document is invalid, which often requires evidence of the decedent’s mental state or evidence of undue influence. That burden is real, and it is one reason early legal guidance matters.
A trust accounting is a formal record of what the trustee has done with trust assets: what came in, what went out, what was paid in fees, and what remains. Beneficiaries are entitled to this information.
A beneficiary might try to remove a trustee for failure to keep the beneficiaries informed or refusing to distribute assets. Short of removal, Michigan law gives beneficiaries a more targeted remedy. A beneficiary can petition the probate court to order the trustee to produce an accounting. Because trusts often avoid probate court oversight, beneficiaries sometimes need to initiate litigation to hold a trustee accountable.
If a trustee has been vague, unresponsive, or actively hostile about sharing financial information, that pattern is worth documenting carefully. Emails, letters, and unanswered requests all become part of the record. Trustees who claim they are “working on it” for months on end while trust assets continue to be managed without oversight are not simply slow. They may be buying time.
Probate courts in Wayne County and Oakland County handle these petitions regularly. The process begins with filing, and in many cases the mere filing of a petition prompts a trustee to produce records they previously claimed were unavailable.
Some forms of trustee misconduct are obvious. Others are easy to overlook, especially when the trustee is a family member and confronting them feels uncomfortable.
Watch for these patterns:
A trustee who does not understand the rules, ignores beneficiary rights, or plays fast and loose with trust assets can turn a streamlined process into a legal disaster.
Each month that passes without accountability is a month during which trust assets may be depleted, transferred, or otherwise placed beyond reach. The longer a problematic trustee remains in control, the harder recovery may become.
Removal is a serious remedy, and Michigan courts do not grant it lightly. But it is available, and in some cases it may be the most important step a beneficiary can take.
The Michigan Trust Code empowers a court to remove a trustee if certain conditions are met. Petitioning the probate court for removal under those provisions is the only process available to an individual who is dissatisfied with a trustee’s performance, absent provisions in the trust document itself relating to trustee removal.
The law authorizes a court to remove a trustee if one or more of the following conditions occur: a breach of trust by the trustee, or substantial impairment of trust administration due to lack of cooperation among co-trustees. Courts may also remove a trustee who has become incapacitated or who has demonstrated an inability to carry out the role.
Courts can remove trustees who breach fiduciary duties, become incapacitated, or demonstrate an inability to administer the trust properly.
Hostility alone, or the fact that a trustee and a beneficiary simply do not get along, may not be enough. Claims of hostility or bias, and the occurrence of other litigation between the beneficiary and trustee, may be insufficient to justify removal of the trustee when there is no evidence of harm to the trust or trust property. The court wants to see that the misconduct has actually harmed, or is likely to harm, the trust and its beneficiaries.
That is why documentation matters from the beginning. Every missed communication, every unanswered request, every suspicious transaction should be preserved.
Claims for trustee misconduct seek remedies like trustee removal, surcharge, meaning financial responsibility placed on the trustee personally, or specific performance rather than invalidation of the trust itself.
A surcharge is a court order requiring the trustee to compensate the trust for losses caused by their misconduct. In some situations, trustees can be held personally liable for mishandling trust assets. Not all trust disputes, even if successful, result in the trustee being held personally liable. Typically, only disputes centered around the mishandling of trust assets trigger personal liability against a trustee.
Courts can also set aside fraudulent transfers, which are transfers made to defeat creditors or to move assets out of the trust in ways that harm beneficiaries.
Recovery is not guaranteed, and the facts of each situation matter significantly. But where a trustee has transferred assets to family members, used trust funds for personal expenses, or sold trust property at artificially low prices, legal avenues to recover those assets may exist. The sooner those transfers are identified and challenged, the more likely recovery becomes.
This is the deadline that catches people off guard. And it is the one that, once missed, may be impossible to recover from.
Trustees can accelerate the contest deadline by sending statutory notice, an option unavailable in will contests. When a trustee sends this formal notice to beneficiaries, a shortened window to challenge the trust begins to run.
A potential contestant who wants to preserve their right to challenge must notify the trustee in writing of a possible judicial proceeding to contest the trust, and a judicial proceeding must then be commenced within 63 days after the contestant sent that notification.
The trustee can thereafter distribute trust assets unless a potential contestant has notified the trustee in writing of a possible judicial proceeding to contest the trust and a judicial proceeding is commenced within 63 days after the contestant has sent the notification. This Michigan Trust Code section provides a statute of limitations in which to contest the validity of a trust that was revocable until the time of the settlor’s death.
What this means in practical terms: if you receive a formal notice from a trustee, the clock may already be running. Waiting to see what happens, hoping things will sort themselves out, or spending weeks trying to gather information on your own could cost you the right to challenge the trust entirely.
If you have received any formal communication from a trustee after a parent’s death, or if you suspect a trust exists that you have not been told about, contact a trust contest attorney in Michigan promptly.
Many beneficiaries are stopped before they even start by a single line buried in the trust document: a no-contest clause, sometimes called an in terrorem clause. These provisions state, in essence, that if you challenge the trust, you forfeit your inheritance.
The fear is real. The clause itself may not be.
Under Michigan law, a provision in a trust that purports to penalize an interested person for contesting the trust or instituting another proceeding relating to the trust shall not be given effect if probable cause exists for instituting a proceeding contesting the trust or another proceeding relating to the trust.
This probable cause exception to a no-contest provision in a trust is one of the few provisions of the Michigan Trust Code that cannot be altered by the trust settlor. That means even if the trust was carefully drafted to close off this exception, it remains in place by operation of law.
In Michigan, a no-contest clause will not be enforced by a court if the petitioner possesses probable cause to challenge the validity of the trust.
Probable cause, in this context, means there is evidence that would lead a reasonable person, properly informed and advised, to conclude there is a legitimate basis for the challenge. It does not mean you need to prove your case before filing. It means you need a reasonable factual foundation.
If you have been sitting on concerns about a parent’s trust because you were afraid of losing your share, that fear may be based on a misunderstanding of Michigan law. A conversation with a trust dispute lawyer can help you assess whether probable cause likely exists in your situation.
Sibling trust disputes are among the most emotionally complicated matters that come through the doors of a Michigan probate court. They often involve not just money, but years of family history, perceived favoritism, and grief.
The most common pattern: one sibling is named as trustee, and the others are beneficiaries. The trustee-sibling delays distributions, provides vague accounting, or makes decisions that appear to benefit themselves. The beneficiary siblings grow frustrated, then suspicious, then angry. By the time anyone contacts an attorney, months or years of trust assets may have been spent, transferred, or simply lost.
Another pattern involves a parent who revised their trust late in life, often after a second marriage or during an illness, in ways that dramatically shifted who receives what. Adult children from a first marriage may find themselves cut out in favor of a stepparent. Or one sibling who was the primary caregiver may have influenced the parent’s decisions in ways that raise questions.
One common reason for trust disputes involves different classifications of beneficiaries within the trust. For example, the spouse of a trustee may be named as a beneficiary to receive the benefits of an estate during life, while children from a prior marriage may be named as beneficiaries to receive benefits of the trust after the spouse passes away. This arrangement may cause confusion and disagreement among individuals and families.
These disputes do not always have to end in courtroom battles. Michigan law establishes mediation procedures that apply to trust disputes, and many probate courts require attempted mediation before proceeding to trial. Mediation, when both sides approach it in good faith, can resolve disputes faster and at lower cost than contested litigation. But mediation works best when each side has legal representation that understands the law and the leverage points in the dispute.
If you are facing a contested trust administration process as a trustee or a beneficiary, we can help. Contact us to schedule a consultation with an experienced lawyer at Head Murphy Law. We provide legal guidance to clients throughout the Detroit area from our office location in Farmington Hills.
Practice Areas
